<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brandon Staggs .Com &#187; enviromentalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandonstaggs.com/tag/enviromentalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com</link>
	<description>Software, Society, the Bible, Politics, and everything else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Global Cooling: Don&#8217;t call it a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2008/01/03/global-cooling-dont-call-it-a-comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2008/01/03/global-cooling-dont-call-it-a-comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2008/01/03/global-cooling-dont-call-it-a-comeback/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s easy to forget that in the 1970s, climatologists were foretelling the coming of a new ice age.  We&#8217;re supposed to forget about that because now the &#8220;consensus&#8221; is that we&#8217;re causing our own warming spell.
But not according to Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, a research scientist for the Oceanology Institute in Russia.  Dr. Sorokhtin points out that climate fluctuations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to forget that in the 1970s, climatologists were foretelling the coming of a new ice age.  We&#8217;re supposed to forget about that because now the &#8220;consensus&#8221; is that we&#8217;re causing our own warming spell.</p>
<p>But <a target="_blank" href="http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html">not according to Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin</a>, a research scientist for the Oceanology Institute in Russia.  Dr. Sorokhtin points out that climate fluctuations have more to do with external variables, like solar heat, than they do with internal ones like minuscule amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The current warming is evidently a natural process and utterly independent of hothouse gases.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>&#8220;Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change. Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind. Man’s influence on nature is a drop in the ocean.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2008/01/03/global-cooling-dont-call-it-a-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming Bureaucrats and Politicians</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/08/20/global-warming-bureaucrats-and-politicians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/08/20/global-warming-bureaucrats-and-politicians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/08/20/global-warming-bureaucrats-and-politicians/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of global warming research is funded by government grants.
These government grants provide excellent job security for researchers. And since they come from the government, an entity not subject to the natural forces of the private sector, results are not particularly important.
Global warming scare mongering gives government agents (politicians and bureaucrats) another foundation on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of global warming research is funded by government grants.</p>
<p>These government grants provide excellent job security for researchers. And since they come from the government, an entity not subject to the natural forces of the private sector, results are not particularly important.</p>
<p>Global warming scare mongering gives government agents (politicians and bureaucrats) another foundation on which to seize power. (Any time politicians preempt the private sector and take away personal freedoms, they are transferring power from the individual to the collective.)</p>
<p>Global warming scare mongers and the government that funds them are in perfect symbiosis and are worthy of the utmost suspicion.</p>
<p>So what happens when this research is scrutinized?</p>
<p>From the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/global_warming_bureaucrat_hans.html">American Thinker</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Last week, Hansen, NASA&#8217;s lead scientist on global warming, penned a rather strange ad hominem attack against critics that questioned the validity of his work in the wake of corrections prompted by Steve McIntyre at Climate Audit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.climateaudit.org/">http://www.climateaudit.org/</a>&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/08/20/global-warming-bureaucrats-and-politicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Many Myths of Ethanol</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/05/23/the-many-myths-of-ethanol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/05/23/the-many-myths-of-ethanol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/wptest/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Stossel exposes The Many Myths of Ethanol:
When everyone in politics jumps on a bandwagon like ethanol, I start to wonder if there&#8217;s something wrong with it. And there is. Except for that fact that ethanol comes from corn, nothing you&#8217;re told about it is true. As the Cato Institute&#8217;s energy expert Jerry Taylor said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Stossel exposes <a target="_blank" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/05/the_many_myths_of_ethanol.html">The Many Myths of Ethanol</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When everyone in politics jumps on a bandwagon like ethanol, I start to wonder if there&#8217;s something wrong with it. And there is. Except for that fact that ethanol comes from corn, nothing you&#8217;re told about it is true. As the Cato Institute&#8217;s energy expert Jerry Taylor said on a recent &#8220;Myths&#8221; edition of &#8220;20/20,&#8221; the case for ethanol is based on a baker&#8217;s dozen myths.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/05/23/the-many-myths-of-ethanol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Hot Air: Why So Gloomy?</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/09/global-hot-air-why-so-gloomy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/09/global-hot-air-why-so-gloomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/wptest/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Global Hot Air: Why So Gloomy?
&#8220;Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we&#8217;ve seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Global Hot Air: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17997788/site/newsweek/">Why So Gloomy?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we&#8217;ve seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting article, to be sure. Even more interesting is the mini-bio for the author:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Lindzen is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research has always been funded exclusively by the U.S. government. He receives no funding from any energy companies.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;because people love to accuse scientists who deny the global warming hysteria of being Evil Oil Company shills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/09/global-hot-air-why-so-gloomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court of Scientists: Exhalers are polluters</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/02/us-supreme-court-of-scientists-exhalers-are-polluters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/02/us-supreme-court-of-scientists-exhalers-are-polluters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/wptest/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Supreme Court has a new diktat for us. Are you ready for this?
Here we go: Carbon Dioxide is a pollutant.
This interesting molecule, without which life on earth would not exist, has been shafted by the US Supreme Court. And I felt sorry for Pluto. This beats what happened to Pluto by a mile.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Supreme Court has a new diktat for us. Are you ready for this?</p>
<p>Here we go: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200704/NAT20070402b.html">Carbon Dioxide is a pollutant</a>.</p>
<p>This interesting molecule, without which life on earth would not exist, has been shafted by the US Supreme Court. And I felt sorry for Pluto. This beats what happened to Pluto by a mile.</p>
<p>The problem with this ruling is not the absurdity of calling CO2 a pollutant (which is certainly absurd), but is, yet again, the US Supreme Court ignoring their Constitutional role and pretending to be legislators.</p>
<p>The Supreme Oligarchy essentially decided that Congress erred in not including CO2 in the list of &#8220;pollutants&#8221; that the EPA is charged with regulating, so they decided to simply amend the law by fiat.</p>
<p>When are people going to wake up and realize that the United States is no longer a country of law, but one of authority? This is not the government described by the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/04/02/us-supreme-court-of-scientists-exhalers-are-polluters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Hot Air: The Absurdity of Anthropogenic Climate Change</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/02/05/global-hot-air-the-absurdity-of-anthropogenic-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/02/05/global-hot-air-the-absurdity-of-anthropogenic-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/wptest/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems laughable that in this stretch of record-low temperatures and ice accumulation that the media is bombarding us with global warming fear mongering. But alas, the crisp weather hasn&#8217;t seemed to reach the socialists behind the latest &#8220;international&#8221; report claiming that the United States is destroying the world with SUVs.
The only question I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems laughable that in this stretch of record-low temperatures and ice accumulation that the media is bombarding us with global warming fear mongering. But alas, the crisp weather hasn&#8217;t seemed to reach the socialists behind the latest &#8220;international&#8221; report claiming that the United States is destroying the world with SUVs.</p>
<p>The only question I have is if Anthropogenic Global Warming will become a footnote in history like the Global Cooling theory or eugenics BEFORE these anti-capitalists get their laws and treaties passed.</p>
<p>Some links for your perusal:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm">Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As Lindzen said many years ago: &#8220;the consensus was reached before the research had even begun.&#8221; Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=156df7e6-d490-41c9-8b1f-106fef8763c6&amp;k=0">The Real Deal?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Dr. Shariv&#8217;s digging led him to the surprising discovery that there is no concrete evidence &#8212; only speculation &#8212; that man-made greenhouse gases cause global warming. Even research from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change&#8211; the United Nations agency that heads the worldwide effort to combat global warming &#8212; is bereft of anything here inspiring confidence. In fact, according to the IPCC&#8217;s own findings, man&#8217;s role is so uncertain that there is a strong possibility that we have been cooling, not warming, the Earth.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249598,00.html">Climate Change&#8217;s Carnival Atmosphere</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Moreover, NASA’s own data indicate that there appears to be no significant change in temperature trend since the early 20th century. No doubt this is why Hansen and his co-authors admit in their study that the time period they considered for their temperature analysis (1990-2006) is “relatively short,” rendering it “difficult to establish the reasons” for this warming.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2007/02/05/global-hot-air-the-absurdity-of-anthropogenic-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming Already Happened</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2006/08/04/global-warming-already-happened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2006/08/04/global-warming-already-happened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enviromentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonstaggs.com/wptest/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Warming Already Happened
People sweltering from a heat wave in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. might find cold comfort in the fact that the temperatures of the past few days are not the hottest on record. That &#8220;honor&#8221; belongs to a summer 76 years ago &#8212; decades before the controversy over &#8220;man-made global warming&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200608/NAT20060804c.html">Global Warming Already Happened</a></p>
<blockquote><p>People sweltering from a heat wave in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. might find cold comfort in the fact that the temperatures of the past few days are not the hottest on record. That &#8220;honor&#8221; belongs to a summer 76 years ago &#8212; decades before the controversy over &#8220;man-made global warming&#8221; began.</p></blockquote>
<p>I simply find it amazing that with something as unpredictable as the weather (we can hardly get an accurate five-day forecast!), people are convinced that human beings are having a measurable impact on it. If you can&#8217;t tell me how hot it&#8217;s going to be next week, how serious am I supposed to take you when you tell me that &#8220;it&#8217;ll be hot and it&#8217;s your fault!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandonstaggs.com/2006/08/04/global-warming-already-happened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
